Search for: "BAKER v. U.S. HOUSING AUTHORITY"
Results 181 - 200
of 293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am
And Iain Henry described the slowly changing reality of the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
In recognition of the festivities, Ben moderated a debate at Brookings on the future of U.S. surveillance authority. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 12:15 pm
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters that while the president would like to work with Congress to close the facility, he would not “rule out the president u [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
Circuit—Hatim et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 5:42 am
Bobby Chesney commented on the CIA’s apparently revived authority to conduct drone strikes, and analyzed the detention of a U.S. citizen in Iraq as a form of “proxy detention. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm
State, 166 Vt. 246 (1997)(school funding law unconstitutional); Baker v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 6:55 am
In Guantanamo news, Jane noted the DC Circuit’s affirmation of the district court’s denial of Abdullah’s motion to enjoin the U.S. government from detaining him in Abdullah v. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 5:47 am
After last week’s U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
The Baker v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:14 am
Sentencing Guidelines to Justify Limiting the Impact of Johnson v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
The beginnings and development of copyright and the First Amendment are still under-observed: Eldred v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Be sure to read Stewart Baker’s post at Volokh Conspiracy in response to DNI Clapper’s statement, as well as Orin Kerr’s post at the same blog focusing on the legal standard Clapper invoked in his statement—the Terry v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In the Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:27 am
In the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 12:30 pm
Dissent: In Bluman v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Chiles, 680 So. 2d 400, 407 (Fla. 1996), for the proposition that the amended complaint raises only nonjusticiable “political” questions, see Baker v. [read post]
