Search for: "BARCLAY V US"
Results 181 - 200
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2011, 4:27 am
A. at V(B)(1). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
R (on the application of Barclay and another) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor and others [2013] EWHC 1183 (Admin) – granted on 24 July 2013 by Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
Please send us any items for inclusion in the next round up to inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
7 May 2013, 6:34 am
More specifically, the complaint (Sheet Metal Workers v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
Please let us know if there are any media and law events which you would like us to list. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 8:22 am
Limited v. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 8:22 am
Limited v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm
(as he then was) cautioned in IBCOS Computers Limited v Barclays Mercantile Highland Finance Limited [1994] FSR 275 that while merely taking a sufficiently general idea does not infringe, to take a detailed “idea” may do so. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:37 am
Michael Barclay has helpfully aggregated the briefs. [read post]
26 May 2021, 5:12 am
That's from Agnant v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:44 am
Three weeks earlier, in BDC Finance LLC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 4:59 pm
Black also vigorously defended his failure to inform the International board of his discussions with the Barclays. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
In this Kat's opinion, furthermore copyright does not only vest in those extracts that include the copyright-protected works mentioned by the CJEU, including the Premier League and Barclays logos, as Arnold J clarified in FAPL v BSkyB and Others (see paras 8 ff; this action originated as an application for a blocking injunction as per section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (CDPA)).There is also copyright in those broadcast extracts which… [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:44 am
(I wonder if Facebook's loose use of the “monopoly” term here will come back to haunt them.). [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
Mississippi; (2) whether the Florida Supreme Court’s per se harmless-error rule for Hurst violations contravenes the Supreme Court’s decisions holding that harmless-error review cannot be “automatic and mechanical,” Barclay v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm
The People) Red meat, yellow journalism & reporting on the copyright alert system in the US (IP Osgoode) The many murky areas of Senator Klobuchar’s ‘Anti-Streaming’ Bill (Public Knowledge) Economic contribution of fair use (Michael Geist) New Register of Copyrights: ‘Unfortunately, I start with enforcement’ (ArsTechnica) The PROTECT IP Act: We’re all infringers now (Likelihood of Confusion) US Copyright – Decisions… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm
The People) Red meat, yellow journalism & reporting on the copyright alert system in the US (IP Osgoode) The many murky areas of Senator Klobuchar’s ‘Anti-Streaming’ Bill (Public Knowledge) Economic contribution of fair use (Michael Geist) New Register of Copyrights: ‘Unfortunately, I start with enforcement’ (ArsTechnica) The PROTECT IP Act: We’re all infringers now (Likelihood of Confusion) US Copyright – Decisions… [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:15 am
From Landino v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:52 am
The seminal decision, Petruis v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
On 6 and 7 May 2020 there was a hearing in the breach of confidence and misuse of private information case of Barclay v Barclay before Warby J. [read post]
