Search for: "BLAKE HARRIS"
Results 181 - 191
of 191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2007, 11:26 am
(There's a website devoted to saving Harry Dresden.) [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
Harris; his first response to the oral argument, heard on Monday, is here. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 4:32 am
Pre-Blakely rulings like Harris and Watts and McMillan are formally still good law. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 6:41 am
Professor Doug Berman at Sentencing Law and Policy looks behind the scenes for answers to the 6-3 vote on Cunningham:Almendarez-Torres, Jones, Apprendi, Harris, Blakely, and Booker, the six major (non-capital) Sixth Amendment rulings of the Rehnquist Court, were all decided by 5-4 votes. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 6:00 am
Almendarez-Torres, Jones, Apprendi, Harris, Blakely, and Booker, the six major (non-capital) Sixth Amendment rulings of the Rehnquist Court, were all decided by 5-4 votes. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:47 am
In the wake of Harris, the Blakely ruling was huge because it showed that five Justices were prepared to make the Apprendi doctrine truly revolutionary. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:53 am
The Court spoke in one voice in Burton to dodge the issue of Blakely retroactivity, but that just ensures more litigation and uncertainty on this consequential issue until SCOTUS resolves it definitively. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
Similarly, Justice Scalia is the only justice to vote with the majority in both Apprendi and Harris v. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 5:57 pm
In the way of Booker and Blakely, some silly District Court judges got the idea that there was a "new concern for procedural fairness in the finding of facts. [read post]
16 Jun 2005, 11:00 am
If the former, the relevant case is Apprendi, a jury trial is required and the standard of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt; if the latter, it is Harris, drug quantity can be determined by a judge, and the standard is a fair preponderance of the evidence. (2) What is the continued efficacy of Harris in the light of the Court's rulings in Blakely and Booker? [read post]
21 Nov 2004, 5:10 pm
Don't forget Blakely! [read post]
