Search for: "BOARD OF EDUC. v. Board of Elections" Results 181 - 200 of 1,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
20 May 2022, 5:58 am by Nicholas Espíritu
Board of Education, held that the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause prohibits racial segregation in public schools. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
February 4, 2021 | A Vision for a Federal Election Agency | Scholars advocate the creation of a new independent agency to oversee all federal election administration. [read post]
11 May 2022, 9:41 am by Eric Goldman
[At the bottom of this post, I’ve included the text as passed by the Minnesota House] The bill fits the “protect-the-kids” narrative that politicians champion during election years, but it’s counterproductive towards that purported goal. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This requirement protects the right to due process by providing such a person the opportunity to be heard before his or her interests are adversely affected (see Matter of Martin v Ronan, 47 NY2d 486, 490 [1979]; Mahinda v Board of Collective Bargaining, 91 AD3d 564, 565 [2012]; Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This requirement protects the right to due process by providing such a person the opportunity to be heard before his or her interests are adversely affected (see Matter of Martin v Ronan, 47 NY2d 486, 490 [1979]; Mahinda v Board of Collective Bargaining, 91 AD3d 564, 565 [2012]; Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This requirement protects the right to due process by providing such a person the opportunity to be heard before his or her interests are adversely affected (see Matter of Martin v Ronan, 47 NY2d 486, 490 [1979]; Mahinda v Board of Collective Bargaining, 91 AD3d 564, 565 [2012]; Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This requirement protects the right to due process by providing such a person the opportunity to be heard before his or her interests are adversely affected (see Matter of Martin v Ronan, 47 NY2d 486, 490 [1979]; Mahinda v Board of Collective Bargaining, 91 AD3d 564, 565 [2012]; Matter of 27th St. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
Biden has asked Congress to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make it easier for highly educated Russians to obtain visas to work in the U.S., according to a section of the administration’s Ukraine supplemental budget requested submitted to lawmakers last week. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Cynics sometimes speak of newly emerging countries that engage in “one-person/one vote” and one-time elections. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]