Search for: "BOOKER" Results 181 - 200 of 3,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2008, 8:00 pm
Booker, and its recent decisions elaborating Booker, the Supreme Court made a high-stakes move that boldly asserted significant responsibility and authority in sentencing judges, local prosecutors, and the Supreme Court itself. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 12:59 pm
Booker, the circuits have divided over how to use the Federal Criminal Sentencing Guidelines when reviewing sentences imposed by district courts. [read post]
28 Sep 2004, 7:08 am
      I invite you to visit Macondo Law and check out the following post Revised - A bit on Booker & Fanfan, and looking back at Mistretta and Apprendi which I think you will find interesting. [read post]
26 May 2012, 11:15 am by Glenn Reynolds
DON’T STEP OFF THE PLANTATION: Democrats Now Mad At Cory Booker. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 3:47 am
  Yet Judge Reinhardt delivers an opinion that, while entirely ignoring Booker, fully embraces a civil standard of proof for guideline enhancements and does not ever mention that Booker changed the standards for appellate review of federal sentencing decisions. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 11:54 am
I am pleased to discover that, over at the USSC's Booker page, one can now find the latest "Quarterly Sentencing Update. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 11:04 am
 Congress --- for failing to seek to reform or revise the entire system after Booker B. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
Warren and Booker had their people in the audience to stand up and cheer. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 10:07 am
Jan 11, 2007) (available here), resolved an interesting little issue concerning Booker's reach:In this appeal, we consider whether United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:00 am
July 7, 2009) (available here), the Ninth Circuit discusses the consideration of state-federal disparities after Booker. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 11:49 am
I have been predicting that the Supreme Court would have to take up a Booker reasonableness case before too long, and today that prediction became a reality. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:25 am by Divorce experts
It is understood that the injunction barred Mr Booker from making any mention the dispute. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 10:55 am
Booker, 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a) was of little significance in federal criminal sentencing. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 10:45 am
"Accordingly, stripped of its facade of a finding of 'extraordinary circumstances' the majority's recall of the mandates in effect applies Booker retroactively to grant relief to defendants whose convictions were final years before Booker was decided. [read post]