Search for: "BOUNDS V. STATE" Results 181 - 200 of 10,060
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2010, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
App., Feb. 23, 2010), a Missouri state appellate court held it is bound by Missouri Supreme Court holdings on whether the 1st Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am by MBettman
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:09 am by Ted Frank
(It's funny that I regularly think of Molski v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Zachary Spilman
CAAF will hear oral argument in a second case on Tuesday, January 24: United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:02 am
In this action, California seeks damages against several major automakers on the grounds of state and federal public nuisance law.The District Court dismissed on the ground that the case raises non-justiciable political questions, with a particular focus on the third factor of Baker v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 8:48 am
In rejecting the plaintiffs’ argument that reliance need not be shown to certify a class under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, the Southern District not only distinguished a seemingly contrary Florida state court decision, but explicitly stated that the court is not bound by that decision.In Pop’s Pancakes, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:05 am
Congress ought to be presumed to understand these well-settled principles -- principles that derive from a dispute involving the United States itself. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:11 pm
I wouldn't have certified this question to the Arizona Supreme Court.It's a fact-bound issue in a diversity case:  Whether, in this particular context, the relevant state statute of limitations commenced in the 1980s or instead when the plaintiff turned 65 in 2009. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:57 am by Gene Quinn
Earlier today the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued it latest decision in Soverain Software LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But state courts are not bound by the federal courts including the U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 5:11 pm
Here’s a comprehensive explanation of the abuse of discretion standard of review in Horsford v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
In the case, a California state appellate court held that former Church of Scientology members were not bound by their agreement to submit all disputes with the Church to the Church's Religious Arbitration system when the dispute involves conduct that occurred after plaintiffs left the Church. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]