Search for: "BRENNAN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 181 - 200 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2015, 3:49 am by Amy Howe
  And in Department of Transportation v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm by Marty Lederman
  The Section 702 exemption thereby reflects what Justice Brennan calleda “solicitude” for “a means by which a religious community defines itself” in cases where the organization determines that its activities “are in furtherance of an organization’s religious mission, and that only those committed to that mission should conduct them. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
To borrow the late Justice William Brennan’s description of originalism in constitutional interpretation, the D.C. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
So he instructed the Justice Department not to push to resume the trial. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
To the best of our knowledge, there is no explanation of the circumstances requiring these ordinances published on the websites of the President’s Secretariat, the Prime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Department of Telecommunications nor the Ministry of Law and Justice as on the date of the writing of this note. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:51 am by crush
  Section 5 of the VRA used to require preclearance of district lines (and other electoral changes) by the Department of Justice in covered jurisdictions, but the Supreme Court struck down the formula determining coverage in Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Remember the DC Circuit opinion in Aamer v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:00 am by Carrie Cordero
The report went on to state: The Administration’s proposal for FISA modernization was comprehensive, and had been coordinated within the Department of Justice and the intelligence community. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 pm by Josh Douglas
  -William Brennan:  He receives an extra push from me because I'm a voting rights guy, and he pretty much started the field with Baker v. [read post]