Search for: "BUSH v. US "
Results 181 - 200
of 4,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2008, 8:37 am
Bush. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
The Uighurs were last year deemed [Kiyemba v. [read post]
1 Jun 2004, 6:22 am
UPDATE: Judge Phyllis Hamilton, US District Court for the Northern District of California, issued this order [PDF] granting a permanent injunction in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 10:11 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] handed down decisions in two cases Tuesday, including Medellin v. [read post]
24 Aug 2005, 9:13 am
[JURIST] Senators Charles Schumer [official website] and Russ Feingold [official website] said Wednesday that they expected US Supreme Court nominee John Roberts to address why he chose not to recuse himself [Schumer press release] from the Hamdan v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:45 am
[JURIST] A judge for the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website] granted summary judgment [opinion, PDF] Monday in favor of the government in CCR v. [read post]
15 Sep 2006, 4:55 am
In the past, the Court has offered same-day transcripts only in the rarest of cases with overwhelming public interest, such as the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 3:17 am
Circuit's ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 6:46 am
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: How Bush v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 4:22 am
This morning in a 5-4 decision in Hein v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:07 pm
Bush, Hamdan v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 11:01 am
Bush and its sister case, Al-Odah v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:42 am
Obviously the Bush administration isn't going to do this.It's clear that the Chamber is worried about an EPA in the post-Bush era. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 4:34 pm
In ACLU v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:40 am
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari this morning in Medellin v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:13 pm
The Bush Administration on Friday urged the Fourth Circuit Court in Richmond, VA, to ignore the contents of a 2003 internal Justice Department legal memo — the now-celebrated “Yoo memo” — that spelled out the military’s authority to use harsh interrogation methods on detained terrorism suspects. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:08 pm
See Sterling v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 6:31 am
Williams Wireless Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 12:57 am
[JURIST] The US has been slow to conduct habeas corpus hearings [JURIST news archive] for Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainees despite a June 2008 US Supreme Court ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 6:59 am
“The FBI continues its secrecy binge by filing a classified justification of its use of a gag order on an ISP in the ongoing Doe v. [read post]
