Search for: "Back v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 45,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 9:38 am
Share on LinkedInShare on TwitterShare by EmailShare Back to top In January 2024, we reported on a significant case, Muldrow v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
This appears to be a known sort of deindexing trick, which I discussed at pp. 300-01 of my Shenanigans (Internet Takedown Edition) piece, and which has been known as far back as 2016, see this Tim Cushing (TechDirt) piece, and likely even earlier. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:42 am
The case is Carlyle Aviation Partners LLC et al. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:33 am
United States, in which the state sought compensation for the temporary flooding on a game management area due to a dam. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
The FT Group’s Chief Executive stated that it is right, “that AI platforms pay publishers for the use of their material. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am
No one was arguing in the Idaho case that EMTALA codifies Roe v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]
5 May 2024, 11:09 am
In-custody transportation through the United States Marshals can take many weeks, with long bus rides during which defendants are shackled, and overnight stays are often in county jails and other contract facilities ill-equipped to address the needs of our incompetent clients.This week, however, the Sixth Circuit gave teeth to the statutory requirements of the Speedy Trial Act in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
Instead, the Supreme Court gave us only the barest-bones outline of a legal test that answers virtually no question that matters, so the lower courts will reach heterogeneous results and the issue will inevitably make its way back to the Supreme Court again. [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:32 am
Over to the team to report on Edwards Lifesciences v Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences (UPC_CFI_249/2023:"The Edwards Lifesciences v Meril preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC on EP 3 763 331 protecting a “Prosthetic valve crimping device” (see here) started with a bang (or should this UPCKat say, crimp?) [read post]
4 May 2024, 1:25 pm
, United States v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 10:35 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 9:03 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:00 am
As we wrote recently in our analysis of Reich v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:05 pm
Co. of Philadelphia v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:46 am
The Hawaii Supreme Court rejected the preemption claims in Honolulu v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
The court doesn’t acknowledge the cases saying that 512(f) preempts state law claims. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
This appears to be a known sort of deindexing trick, which I discussed at pp. 300-01 of my Shenanigans (Internet Takedown Edition) piece, and which has been known as far back as 2016, see this Tim Cushing (TechDirt) piece, and likely even earlier. [read post]
