Search for: "Banks v. Department of Revenue"
Results 181 - 200
of 659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:23 pm
Lenders must also abide by the applicable requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act and its implementing regulations. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 am
Section 3707, Encouraging the Use of Telecommunications Systems for Home Health Services in Medicare: This section requires the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to issue clarifying guidance encouraging the use of telecommunications systems, including remote patient monitoring, to furnish home health services consistent with the beneficiary care plan during the COVID-19 emergency period. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:30 am
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
The Maryland taxable revenues would be subject to different rates based on global annual gross revenues for the broader business, not just advertising revenues, let alone just revenues attributable to Maryland. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:05 am
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:50 pm
In total, Butler caused a tax loss to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of $1,093,400. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am
Trump v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
Pirates also embrace a host of academics and corporate legal departments that push their views. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:49 am
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm
Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 1:55 am
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:13 am
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 1:31 am
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:41 am
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am
Montana Department of Revenue] is an indication, the ruling this spring may hinge on the dangerous fallacy that separation of church and state is hostility toward religion akin to overt racial discrimination. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 2:30 am
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am
Montana Department of Revenue] may seem small: a discontinued state program that offered $150 tax credits to help spur $500 tuition scholarships[, b]ut the stakes are high for both sides in the national debate over public aid for religious schools. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 1:32 am
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants, heard 28 November 2019. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:57 am
Shortly after the program was enacted, the Montana Department of Revenue enacted an administrative rule that prohibited scholarship recipients from using their scholarships at religious schools. [read post]
