Search for: "Banning Company v. California"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
In the case of AT & T Mobility v Concepcion, the Supreme Court ruled that a California's prohibition of allowing corporations to waive class action lawsuit rights was trumped by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 12:00 am
Florida is second only to California in the number of 2016 filings. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 12:00 am
Florida is second only to California in the number of 2016 filings. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:00 am
In light of the public outcry over CEO pay, we’ve learned that California is considering a bill, SB 1372, that would offer tax breaks to companies based on the “compensation ratio” between the amount paid to that company’s CEO (or highest-paid employee) and the median income level of all of the company’s employees. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:31 am
Companies that make blatantly unreasonable initial royalty demands may also lose a partial summary judgment decision over a breach-of-contract issue. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 10:25 am
There’s nothing illegal about a high-level employee moving from one company to a competing company (especially in California, which bans non-compete agreements). [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
Perfect Body Image * The Florida Bar Regulates, But Doesn’t Ban, Competitive Keyword Ads * Rounding Up Three Recent Keyword Advertising Cases–Comphy v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
Had the lawsuit been in California, it would have almost certainly triggered anti-SLAPP protection and probably would have run afoul of California’s new law banning anti-review clauses. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 am
Perfect Body Image * The Florida Bar Regulates, But Doesn’t Ban, Competitive Keyword Ads * Rounding Up Three Recent Keyword Advertising Cases–Comphy v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:08 am
The Court’s pending case in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
Companies on my shitlist include: 1-800 Contacts, Overstock…and now Edible Arrangements. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:30 pm
Seyfarth Synopsis: Pay equity and Ban The Box bills lead the list of bills approved to continue their quest (moving to the other house of the California Legislature) to become California law. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:04 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:09 pm
In the case, Chamber of Commerce of the USA, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
The California Channel does not appear to have any express policy permitting unlicensed use for any purpose.] [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:42 am
The court says: “If companies like LinkedIn, whose servers hold vast amounts of public data, are permitted selectively to ban only potential competitors from accessing and using that otherwise public data, the result—complete exclusion of the original innovator in aggregating and analyzing the public information—may well be considered unfair competition under California law. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:04 pm
Last month Apple said it wanted to add the Samsung Galaxy S4 smartphone to the second California litigation going on between these two companies. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:50 am
If you’re going to go after a trillion dollar company, at least you should bring your A-game. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:32 am
The case is: County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 5:43 am
Aside from categorical bans, other states limited the circumstances in which companies could enforce non-competes. [read post]
