Search for: "Barnes v City of New York" Results 181 - 200 of 222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2010, 3:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to the motion (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 2:07 pm by Matt Sundquist
The New York Times describes the possibility that the Court's decision in Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Nelson (New York University). [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:37 am
Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this article on City of Ontario v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
Robert Barnes at the Washington Post and John Schwartz of the New York Times discuss Skilling v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:22 am by Jay Willis
Finally, Above the Law reports on comments last week by Gerard Lynch during a speech in New York City. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
  At the New York Times, Adam Liptak details the issues at stake in the case, highlighting Alvarez's implications for due process. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
  Savage also jokes that the new Justice upstaged Scalia outside the courtroom as well when she was asked to throw out the first pitch at a New York Yankees game. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
Shatzer, Graham/Sullivan, McDonald, and American Needle) Robert Barnes focuses on the “newer” Justices and their impacts on this Term. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:44 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run September 20, 2009. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:23 am
  Yitzhak is associated with the Law Offices of Gabriel Del Virginia in New York City. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 7:33 am
City of Boston, to "Fan Cries Foul," (Jeffery Swiecicki v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
City of Stamford, 699 A.2d 52, 55 & n.8 (Conn. 1997). [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:46 am
Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to those parts of the first cross motion (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562, 404 N.E.2d 718, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595). [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 12:25 pm
" When Petrone filed suit against the two men for negligence in "failing to guard [Petrone] from the dog's known vicious propensities" and for violating the New York City leash laws, the Queens County Supreme Court dismissed the case. [read post]