Search for: "Barrett"
Results 181 - 200
of 6,213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am
[Tillman on most things: "There are multiple aspects of the standard narrative ... that just don’t make any sense and that people just have mindlessly repeated for almost two centuries now,”] Tablet, a Jewish Magazine, published a lengthy profile of my dear colleague Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am
This brief, which is on behalf of Professor Seth Barrett Tillman and the Landmark Legal Foundation, contends that Special Counsel Jack Smith is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:17 am
As noted, Justice Barrett (and Justice Kavanaugh) seemed to think that review of an administrative stay is simply unavailable. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
‘Very, Very Troubling’: Judges, lawyers flummoxed by Judge Cannon MSN – Devlin Barrett and Perry Stein (Washington Post) | Published: 3/20/2024 Lawyers and former judges said they are baffled by an order issued by the federal judge overseeing Donald Trump’s pending trial on charges he mishandled classified documents, and believe her instructions suggest the case will not go to trial anytime soon. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:55 am
“It went about as I predicted it would,” she said, sketching out what she saw to be the dynamics on the bench, with three sympathetic justices (Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas), three swing votes (Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and Chief Justice John Roberts), and three skeptics (Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Brown Jackson). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett pressed Bidwell on the limits of her rule. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Primary” by Tobi Raji (Washington Post) for MSN Ethics National: “Cannon Tells Lawyers to Weigh If Trump Conduct Can’t Be Reviewed by Courts” by Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) for MSN National: “Jan. 6 Defendant Got 2 Congressional Internships After She Allegedly Breached the Building” by Kyle Cheney (Politico) for Yahoo News Michigan: “‘New Day in Lansing’ as Lawmakers Advance FOIA Bills, Introduce… [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am
As Justice Amy Coney Barrett seemingly implied during the Murthy v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:57 am
Going forward, I'm not sure if Justice Barrett's concurrence will have the effect that she intended. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am
But , the two justices whose votes were most likely the difference—Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett—signed a concurring opinion (by Barrett) to explain their votes. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:11 pm
Justice Barrett raised some fair questions on how administrative stays should be granted. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:00 pm
"[S]tate officials have private lives and their own constitutional rights—including the First Amendment right to speak about their jobs and exercise editorial control over speech and speakers on their personal platforms," wrote Justice Amy Coney Barrett for a unanimous Court. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The Sequel to Doe v. Mills: Justice Barrett Tightens The Screws On The Shadow Docket
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
Here, Barrett cited her Doe v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:28 pm
Barrett indicated that the court of appeals “presumably” can act “promptly. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:15 pm
Justice Barrett highlighted that the Fifth Circuit’s order allowing the law to go into effect was an “administrative stay” instead of a “stay pending appeal. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 11:52 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett raised a hypothetical in which Louisiana state officials are doxed and targeted by threats made on social media.Read 28 remaining paragraphs | Comments [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:41 am
In one example, Justice Amy Coney Barrett expressed surprise when Louisiana Solicitor General J. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:34 am
Justice Sotomayor delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:58 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 2:07 pm
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett also appeared concerned about the broad implications of the challengers’ position. [read post]
