Search for: "Barrett v. Thomas "
Results 181 - 200
of 1,026
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
BARRETT, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which THOMAS, J., joined. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
” Justice Barrett, remember, clerked for Justice Scalia, author of the watershed confrontation clause case, Crawford v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 7:02 am
Gorsuch, and Amy Coney Barrett joined. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:09 pm
see also Fulton v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:27 am
Both courts ruled that Kachalsky v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:02 am
Justice Barrett did not participate in the ruling. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 10:54 am
Nonetheless, Acheson Hotels v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:18 am
Justices Barrett and Thomas dissent. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:55 pm
NRA v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 6:54 am
DOS v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
” (Cites to In re Facebook, Barrett v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:06 am
The opinion — in Nestlé v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:38 pm
” Barrett acknowledged that past cases such as U.S. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 7:31 am
Among the opinions was Justice Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court debut. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:42 pm
Mentioned nowhere in Feldman's column is an important fact: Justice Scalia, as well as Justice Thomas, joined Chief Justice Rehnquist's concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 6:05 am
In Barr v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
Thomas J for the majority (Roberts CJ, and Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett JJ concurring) held that a restriction on carrying arms in public for self-defense reasons was inconsistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation and was thus unconstitutional. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
Justice Barrett wrote a second dissent, joined by Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kagan. [read post]
