Search for: "Baxter v. Baxter" Results 181 - 200 of 784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
That's a lot of m*****f***ing.First there was People v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 2:19 am by war
LED Technologies Pty Ltd v Roadvision Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 146 // [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 8:03 am by Eric Baxter
Eric Baxter is Senior Counsel at The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in Washington, D.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:48 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Divison) Dhorajiwala, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1237 (09 June 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Morge, R (on the application of) v Hampshire County Council [2010] EWCA Civ 608 (10 June 2010) Beechwood Birmingham Ltd v Hoyer Group UK Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 647 (10 June 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Baxter & Ors v McCann [2010] EWHC 1330 (QB) (10 June 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:50 pm by Christopher Danzig
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Andrew Peck, Baker, Baxter, Baxter Baker Sidle Conn & Jones, Computer-assisted review, Conn & Jones, Craig Ball, Document Review, E-Discovery, Electronic Discovery, Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 5:00 pm
Votes: Corrigan, A.C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin and Moreno, JJ. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 4:16 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In order for the moving party to satisfy its burden at step one, it must " show[ ] that the facts and circumstances of the voir dire raise an inference that the other party excused one or more jurors for an impermissible reason'" (People v Baxter, 108 AD3d 1158, 1159, 969 N.Y.S.2d 678 [4th Dept 2013], quoting People v Smocum, 99 NY2d 418, 421, 786 N.E.2d 1275, 757 N.Y.S.2d 239 [2003]). [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:38 am by Matt C. Bailey
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, and Corrigan, JJ. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am by David DePaolo
Supreme Court case is Sierra Chemical v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]