Search for: "Bear Stops v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 1,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
In 1934, Congress enacted the National Firearms Act, banning among other weapons sawed-off shotguns, and the Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of the Act in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:12 am by rquintilone
Additionally, the employer failed to give notice when it stopped using its claims adjusting agent and took its claims unit in-house. [read post]
8 May 2012, 1:34 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Moderator: Kelly Maser, United States Olympic Committee (United States) Ambush marketing: capitalizing on the excitement surrounding an event. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:07 am by Trevor Cutaiar
On June 6, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit handed down its decision in Jarvis v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:41 am
By all accounts, oral argument before the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
This is significant if you bear in mind that the two countries share the same language. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
Additionally, the Supreme Court of the United States recently noted, `[m]odern cell phones are not just another technological convenience. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]