Search for: "Beck/Herrmann"
Results 181 - 200
of 270
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2008, 12:31 pm
Following a post by Dechert's James Beck and Jones Day's Mark Herrmann, co-authors of the Drug and Device Law blog, the Wall Street Journal's Dan Slater asked whether law firm blogs were a marketing device or a mere diversion. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 1:39 pm
If the two of us — Beck and Herrmann, the blogging morons — want to waste our Saturday mornings feeding this beast, we should go ahead and entertain ourselves. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:40 am
” So why, ask Beck and Herrmann, are so many firms indifferent or unsupportive of their lawyers’ blogging efforts? [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 12:33 am
” Beck and Herrmann and the comments discuss several reasons Big Law may not support blogging. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 6:22 am
[Beck/Herrmann]. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 11:05 am
Herrmann and Beck. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:13 am
So, if anyone from Dxchert or Jxnes Day comes to this site, Beck and Herrmann each deny that they wrote this post. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 6:05 am
Beck, Jim Beck, Bexis, Mark Herrmann, Marc Herrmann, Mark Herman, Mark Herrman, Mark Hermann. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:10 am
In other words, big government is now the only safety mechanism.This post from Beck/Herrmann at Drug and Device Law is worth noting, since they represent device makers, defend these suits, and have been championing such a decision for a long time.Now that they won, it means they have lost business. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 9:15 pm
Beck and Herrmann, blogging on the same New York Times story we did, raise a fascinating point about the possible tendency of drug trials to generate false positives as to a risk of suicidality. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 9:05 pm
They just might [Beck/Herrmann] Rhode Island nightclub fire deep pockets, cont'd: concert sponsor Clear Channel agrees to pay Station victims $22 million, adding to other big settlements [ProJo; earlier] Manhattan federal judge says "madness" of hard-fought commercial suit "presents a cautionary tale about the potential for advocates to obscure the issues and impose needless burdens on busy courts" [NYLJ] Wooing Edwards and his voters? [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 8:40 am
Over at Drug and Device Law, Beck and Herrmann note that, while Defendants are generally thought to hate E-Discovery, "Defendants shouldn't let their dislike of e-discovery blind them to its potential advantages in a world where more and more people... [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:28 am
Pepper Hamilton has been flogged up one side of the legal blogosphere and down the other for the slip, but Beck/Herrmann says that isn't fair: the misdirected email doesn't appear to have made much difference. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:56 am
Kent argument later this month (for which, see Beck/Herrmann), those cases will be reversed as a matter of law. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 7:50 pm
Are you reading Mark Herrmann and Jim Beck's Drug and Device Law Blog? [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:33 am
" Query what confidentiality orders or arrangements may have been breached in the making of this article.No, our reminiscences go back much further - back to Bone Screws, the litigation where Beck and Herrmann first met. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 1:44 am
Over at the Drug and Device Blog, Beck/Herrmann have a theory that they want tested with a scientific study:It strikes us that the plaintiffs in pharmaceutical product liability cases are always striking the educated jurors. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 4:48 pm
Beck and Herrmann give a lengthy, but must-read, explanation why the esoteric 21 C.F.R. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 9:09 am
(If the post annoyed you, and hundreds of Canadians are getting ready to come over the border after us, then Beck wrote the post, and he lives in Philadelphia. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 9:18 pm
[Beck/Herrmann] California proposes allowing government to remotely set your thermostat [Walter Williams; Cafe Hayek] Old problems not getting any better: "a New York Times article in 1897 (!) [read post]
