Search for: "Been v. Jolly"
Results 181 - 200
of 200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2009, 1:35 pm
The law firm representing the Plaintiffs in The Cottages of Stonehenge Condominium Homeowners Association, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:45 am
See Jolly v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 6:52 pm
Whether the departure of three partners from a law firm LLC was a withdrawal or a dissolution of the LLC was the issue in Mitchell, Brewer, Richardson, Adams, Burge & Boughman, PLLC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 4:49 pm
Loss #1: In Fry v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:40 am
Judge Jolly's decision for a panel consisting of one of the most senior and the most junior of 5th Circuit judges, Judge Catharina Haynes, held that Hall Street Associates LLC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 3:58 pm
Garrett argued that he was entitled to an exception to this general rule (under a case called Texfi Industries v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
As the student post has described, the 9th Circuit recently held in Betz v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 5:03 pm
Ealing LBC v Jama B5/08/0104 was a Court of Appeal matter. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
On August 5th, in Hamm v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
Today, Judge Jolly ruled on a Motion to Dismiss in Essa Commercial Real Estate, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
Jolly Caplash who agrees to purchase Dr. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:58 pm
Voyager Pharmaceutical Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 4:04 am
Merpel says, there's a jolly good little bibliography at the end of this report.This report is not available online but the authors would like it to be more widely read. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 5:29 am
In a dispute that concerns all stripe-wearing kats, Case C-102/07 is a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden in the exciting contest of Adidas AG and Adidas Benelux BV v Marca Mode, C&A Nederland, H&M Hennes & Mauritz Netherlands BV and Vendex KBB Nederland BV. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
Div. 1990) (following Jolly); Vaught v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:02 am
The Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sir Andrew Morritt C and Lords Justices Jacob and Lloyd) has given its decision in Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd; Nova Productions Ltd v Bell Fruit Games Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 219, an appeal from the decision of Kitchin J which was noted by the IPKat here.In short, this appeal concerned two actions. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:04 am
The Bible had already been removed in response to a federal court order. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 4:47 am
The IPKat thinks this is a jolly good publication and he'd like to be able to tell you the price, but there doesn't appear to be one. [read post]
