Search for: "Best v. Mitchell" Results 181 - 200 of 370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm by Brian E. Barreira
  The document has not been vetted or published in any official manner, has been withheld from public view, and may be best described as an essay, so it will be referred to herein as the “MassHealth Essay. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm by Brian E. Barreira
  The document has not been vetted or published in any official manner, has been withheld from public view, and may be best described as an essay, so it will be referred to herein as the “MassHealth Essay. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:07 pm by Michael Froomkin
This time, the two best performers in the group were Ariel Fernandez and – surprisingly given the first debate – PJ Mitchell, who spoke really well. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 4 March 2015 there was a unilateral statement in open court in the case of Rowland v Mitchell. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm by Michael Froomkin
Yesterday I attended the Coral Gables Forum candidates’ debate for Coral Gables Commission Group V election. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
£10,000 (a) Garcia v Associated Newspapers Limited, £45,000 (c)  Appleyard v Wilby, £60,000 (b) Asghar v Nawaijang, £270,000 (3) The following letter appeared in The Times following the judgment in the Andrew Mitchell libel trial. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:25 am by INFORRM
I don’t think there is anyone better” (a) Mark Lewis (b) Mark Stephens (c) Louis Charalambous (d) Paul Tweed (7) Which media lawyer is mentioned on one of the best selling DVDs of the year? [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
I don’t think there is anyone better” (a) Mark Lewis (b) Mark Stephens (c) Louis Charalambous (d) Paul Tweed (7) Which media lawyer is mentioned on one of the best selling DVDs of the year? [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm by Giles Peaker
That application was dismissed by Judge Mitchell in March 2014. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am by INFORRM
Indeed on the issue of whether Tim Yeo’s behaviour met the obligations of “selflessness and integrity” required of an MP, a judge was the best person to give “a clear and reasoned answer” since, “an inscrutable jury verdict, open to interpretations, would not be desirable”. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:36 am by Marty Lederman
 That the means of assault involved religious symbolism confirms only that he knew how best to hurt his parents. [read post]