Search for: "Bias v. Martin" Results 181 - 200 of 224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2010, 8:50 am by Steve Hall
It is subject to examiner bias. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 8:11 pm by cdw
” [via Ninth Circuit  blog] Shaun Martin has more. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm by WSLL
Hubbard, Deputy Attorney General; Martin L. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 12:40 pm
Monday was Martin Luther King day, so counsel drove to the post office herself first thing in the morning Tuesday, and sent the papers express mail for guaranteed delivery Wednesday, which is when they were due. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Apr. 20, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of Computer Spec's multiple claims of retaliation> Martin v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
DSM N.V., et al: Disability claim dismissed because Plaintiff Was Not "Otherwise Qualified" to Perform the Essential Functions of Her Job* FILED* [1-14] Lockheed Martin sued by women for class-based sex/denial of opportunities for advancement discrim; more here* NEWS* [1-13] Teaneck fires Township Mgr following string of harassment lawsuitsNYDECIDED* [1-13] St Ct App: Matter of Vinluan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Foley & Lardner8th Cir.o Appellate Court Upholds EEOC's Religious Bias Verdict against AT&T EEOC v AT&TD.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:13 am
Supreme Court, Inc. then went on to validate more radical deregulatory maneuvers in Watters v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Webb, No. 06-5806 An order denying a 28 U.S.C. section 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus from a conviction for assault is affirmed over claims that judicial bias, ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and his invalid plea of guilty warranted reversal of the district court's decision. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
Railey argues that judicial bias, ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and his invalid plea of guilty warrant reversal of the district court's decision. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Martin, No. 06-5605 A conviction and sentence for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed primarily where the district court's permitting a police officer to testify as both an expert and a fact witness, without the issuance of a cautionary instruction to the jury, did not constitute reversible error under US v. [read post]