Search for: "Billings v. Billings" Results 181 - 200 of 29,883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2019, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Source: Stas_V / iStock / Getty Images The legislature passed Assembly Bill (AB) 5 late September 10, a bill that largely codifies the 2018 Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:08 pm by Anthony Zaller
  This is also consistent with the California Supreme Court’s holding in Ross v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:00 am by HRWatchdog
 Update on AB 5 Several amendments were made to AB 5 (Gonzalez; D-San Diego), the bill that codifies the ABC independent contractor employment test established in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 8:45 am
The bill would codify portions of last year’s California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm by Shannon O'Hare
This approach has been endorsed and adopted in the recent case National Bank of Kazakhstan and the Republic of Kazakhstan v Bank of New York Mellon, Anatolie Stati and others. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:36 am by Administrator
The Communications (Retention of Data) Bill 2009, published last week, has caused a bit of a stir in this morning’s newspapers. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:03 pm by David M. McLain
This bill is an attempt to address a court decision, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona v Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company 205 P.3D 529 (Colo. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 11:52 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
  In addition to multiple provisions to reform the CFPB, the bill contains a provision intended to override the Second Circuit’s opinion in Madden v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:37 pm by Sam Favate
Opponents of personhood laws say they are part of a strategy which would make abortion illegal immediately in the event the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 10:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
It does not clarify that tribes can issue protection orders over non-Natives on the reservation (p. 5, line 9) The bill fails to clarify that every tribe has full civil jurisdiction to issue and enforce protection orders against non-Natives Fails to reverse Martinez v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 10:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
It does not clarify that tribes can issue protection orders over non-Natives on the reservation (p. 5, line 9) The bill fails to clarify that every tribe has full civil jurisdiction to issue and enforce protection orders against non-Natives Fails to reverse Martinez v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 12:50 pm
Bush v. the Bill of Rights": The New York Times contains this editorial today. [read post]