Search for: "Billings v. Smith" Results 181 - 200 of 1,621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2022, 2:12 pm by NARF
Smith (Indian Child Welfare Act; Michigan Indian Family Preservation Act) The Navajo Nation v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
  As former Kat David Pearce (Tufty) explains in this post, another example has recently arisen: it concerns allegations of misuse of Traditional Knowledge from India relating to various herbs.* Law Down Under: New Censorship Bill Passed in AustraliaAs Jani explains, the Australian Parliament has just passed the Copyright Amendment (Online Infringement) Bill 2015, which aims to give the Australian courts more tools to combat online copyright infringement. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 883–85 (1990), and re-establish the “balancing” test established by Sherbert v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
”   Seasoned attorneys—or those who were practicing law before the United States Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Bates v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:23 am by Broc Romanek
John Fund Decision As we await the important fraud standard decision of Halliburton v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:20 am by Kim Colby
In response to Smith, Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act by an overwhelming, bipartisan vote, and President Bill Clinton signed it into law. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am by Gabriel Chin
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 3:33 am by Edward Smith
Protecting Undocumented Immigrants in Personal Injury Cases   Protecting Undocumented Immigrants in Personal Injury Cases I’m Ed Smith, a Stockton Personal Injury Attorney. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm by Erin Miller
In the “white primary” cases (Smith v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 12:27 am
The case is Video Software Dealers Association v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am by Kiran Bhat
” Briefly: Campbell Robertson and Adam Liptak of the New York Times preview next Tuesday’s argument in Smith v. [read post]