Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 19,959
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2019, 8:10 am by Neoshia Roemer
This excerpt from the recent FMC Corp. v. [read post]
The bill goes on to state that no state can deny any individual the right to marry on the basis of sex, race, ethnicity or national origin. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:42 am
The bill is structured to satisfy the framework requirement laid down by the Supreme Court in T.N.Godavarman Thirumulpad v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:10 am by Payton Smith
The move places the bill in the hands of Governor Andy Beshear, the state’s new Democratic governor. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff attorney loses fee case against pro-se client because he could not show substantial compliance with the matrimonial billing rules of 22 NYCRR 1400, et seq in Swergold v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“”[E]ither retention of bills without objection or partial payment may give rise to an account stated” (Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Waters, 13 AD3d 51, 52 [1st Dept 2004]). [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 10:26 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
But now -- less than a month into state legislative sessions, and about a week after the 40th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:04 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
This week a divided panel of the Fifth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 2:49 am by Lana Ulrich
The last time the Supreme Court “incorporated” a provision of the Bill of Rights to apply against the states was in 2010, in the McDonald v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 8:06 am by MSP Education Blog
  Bio-Medical Applications is a dialysis provider who was billing Central States for treatment being provided to a patient with end-stage renal disease. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 5:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
See Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v Neuman, 93 AD2d 745, 746 [1st Dept 1983] (account stated established by receiving and retaining bills without any timely objection); Liddle O’Connor, Finkelstein & Robinson v Koppelman, 215 AD2d 204 [1st Dept 1995] (account stated based only on partial payment); Bracken & Margolin, LLP v Schambra, 270 AD2d 221 [2d Dept 2000] (account stated based on retention of invoices without… [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
Source: Stas_V / iStock / Getty Images The legislature passed Assembly Bill (AB) 5 late September 10, a bill that largely codifies the 2018 Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 4:44 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  Meanwhile, the tiny state of Rhode Island is expected to become, through the passage of legislation, the tenth state to approve same-sex marriages.The bill has been approved by both houses of the RI legislature; the state senate made some minor changes last week. [read post]
The bill anticipates the overturning of these decisions, as signaled by Justice Clarence Thomas in his concurrence in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The heartbeat bill would have violated Supreme Court cases going back to Roe v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Holtzman v Griffith  2018 NY Slip Op 04540  Decided on June 20, 2018  Appellate Division, Second Department illustrates the almost overpowering quality of the “account stated” doctrine, in which the failure to object (in writing) to bills from attorneys (or others) can serve as a conclusion that the recipient has accepted the bills without objection and now must pay. [read post]