Search for: "Bitter v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 334
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2015, 2:15 pm
It is considered by many, including some congressional leaders, to be a cause of the riots in Benghazi that led to the death of the United States Ambassador to Libya. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:39 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
For much of the rest of the world we must be the focus of bitter amusement, characters in a satire we don’t understand. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:40 am by Wells Bennett
Even the non-terrorism Supreme Court case Steve cites as evidence of a greater judicial willingness to confer constitutional protections on non-citizens in the United States—Zadvydas v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am by Myron Orfield
As Richard Nixon’s HUD secretary and attorney general, they brought the case that persuaded the Eighth Circuit: United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
Cafferata-Jenkins has denied the allegations and said Lawrence is bitter after losing his job in April. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  At 11 a.m., the Court will hear a federal case, United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
But where relationships go awry and bitter feelings permeate, it is common sense on the part of both parties to sever professional ties with one another. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm by Michael Lowe
Back in January, we warned about what happened today: the United States Supreme Court has okayed police pulling people over to search their vehicles based upon an anonymous tip in the case of Navarette v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm by Mark Walsh
There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]