Search for: "Bode v. Bode"
Results 181 - 200
of 507
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2017, 1:15 pm
As we argued in our friend-of-the-court brief in the case, Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 6:06 am
Miyoko's Kitchen v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 5:01 am
This is particularly true when the taxpayer is an attorney.A recent Tax Court case, Mack v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit and the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:02 am
Only one outlier judge in the UK has so far tried to usurp jurisdiction on a global scale (in Unwired Planet v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:51 am
Whitney v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 10:13 am
General Assembly passed the “Uniting for peace” Resolution 377 (V)A. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:55 am
See the uncited Standard Process v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:29 am
The other two are APE TEES (EUIPO v Nowhere, C-337/22 P) and SHOPPI (Shopify v EUIPO, C-751/22 P, see here and here)). [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm
Circuit (minus Judge Srinivasan) will confront in tomorrow’s oral argument in al Bahlul v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:04 am
And at the Daily Journal (via How Appealing), Lawrence Hurley predicts that the decision’s First Amendment implications might bode well for other free speech cases on the Court’s docket this Term, such as Holder v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:36 am
On Thursday, Judge William Alsup concluded the district court phase of the Oracle v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:14 pm
Bush and Boumediene v. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 11:16 am
On Tuesday I mostly wanted to publish the news quickly, and I focused on the commercial consequences.The legal standard applied by Judge Koh was stated as follows in the Ninth Circuit's 2006 opinion in Miller v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:47 am
Judge Tallman doesn't (right), in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:17 am
The fact that he and his team have focused efforts on the patent bar examination demonstrates that no corner of the Patent Office will go without review under his tenure, which bodes well for the patent system as a whole. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:19 pm
Well, the California Supreme Court placed Chung v. the People of California on hold pending its decision in Troyer. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 8:44 am
Airways v. [read post]
