Search for: "Boston Scientific Corporation"
Results 181 - 200
of 336
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
Boston Scientific Corporation et al, 1-11-cv-03619 (ILND March 6, 2012, Order) (Castillo, J.) [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:08 pm
The present decision applies to those claims against American Medical Systems, Boston Scientific Corporation, and Ethicon (a Johnson & Johnson related entity). [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
A jury in Texas in January awarded $482 million to Saffran in a patent case against Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Cordis Corporation and Boston Scientific Corporation. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
A jury in Texas in January awarded $482 million to Saffran in a patent case against Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Cordis Corporation and Boston Scientific Corporation. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:27 am
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 2:46 pm
The Edwards’ representation involved litigation in Minnesota, Massachusetts and Colorado, principally relating to the movement of employees from Boston Scientific Corporation to Edwards Lifesciences. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
Boston Scientific, 631 F.3d 762 (5th Cir. 2011). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:00 am
Kealy is a clinical associate professor of law and the director of the legislation programs at Boston University School of Law. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:59 pm
Boston Scientific Corp., 631 F.3d 762, 768 (5th Cir. 2011). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
If they were unable to resolve the dispute jointly, the chief executive officer of Boston Scientific was entitled to resolve it unilaterally, provided that if Mann or his successor disagreed with Boston Scientific's decision, Mann could refer the matter to a committee of three independent business people jointly selected by Mann and the Boston Scientific chief executive officer to propose a nonbinding resolution. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
Here, reports indicate that even though the FDA had pulled a similar mesh design created by Boston Scientific Corporation from the market, the FDA continued approving the similarly designed vaginal mesh created by Johnson & Johnson. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:43 am
In the instance of vaginal mesh, the agency kept passing the implants manufactured and sold by Johnson & Johnson with little to no testing, based on the product’s comparability to the ProteGen formerly made by Boston Scientific Corp which was removed from the market for safety issues. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:23 am
This alleged business practice emerged in a recently settled False Claims Act action against Guidant LLC, a subsidiary of Boston Scientific Corporation. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
HemCon, Inc (Patents Post-Grant) (Patently-O) (Reexamination Alert) (IPBiz) CAFC: Construing claim constructions: Cordis Corporation v Boston Scientific (Patently-O) (IPBiz) Kimberly-Clark: CAFC loses an opportunity to address law of preliminary injunctions: Kimberly Clark v First Quality Baby Products (IPBiz) The Federal Circuit’s rare opportunity to protect the public from agency misconduct: In re Jeff Lovin (Patently-O) District Court C D California: Another false… [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 8:39 am
Bard, Coloplast, Mentor Corporation, and Proxy Biomedical. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:13 pm
Boston Scientific Corporation (Fed. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:56 am
But there’s a second matter that Boston Scientific disclosed last week (in an 8-K filed Sept. 12) which may result in an even deeper dip into the corporation’s coffers. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
(Patents Post-Grant) US Patents Short update on reissue declarations after Tanaka (WHDA) General Order 11-11 implementing the patent pilot project in the Eastern District of Texas (EDTexweblog.com) An empirical exploration of first-to-invent versus first-to-file (Patently-O) Joint inventors (Inventive Step) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: “Broad conclusory statements” alone are insufficient to establish obviousness: Mytee Products v Harris Research (IPBiz) BPAI:… [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 4:21 am
The issue was then dramatically brought back into headlines by the suicide of Dave Duerson, who, in an ironic mixture of mental illness and rational foresight, donated his brain to Boston University so they could test it for brain damage. [read post]
