Search for: "Branch v. State Bar"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,754
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2023, 5:31 am
On Dec. 13, 2022, the Israeli Supreme Court published a 51-page judgment in Kohelet Forum v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Edwards was clearly offended by my essay; he is not the last judge who has castigated the general trend of academic scholarship to become, well, more “academic” and of less, if any, interest to the bench and bar. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 10:00 am
We initiated the State Law Libraries Outreach Project to strengthen ties between the Law Library and state law libraries. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:21 pm
The court decision in Seventh Dimension, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
Constitution’s elections clause barred any state judicial review of the federal map. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 5:46 pm
" King v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm
” And Don Verrilli, arguing on behalf of North Carolina executive-branch officials, suggested a possible test, which he characterized as the “best distillation” of Rehnquist’s concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 6:32 pm
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:11 pm
I have now had a chance to review the transcript in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:55 pm
When Prelogar responded that they would not, Roberts reminded her of the court’s recent decision in Biden v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:43 pm
The policy at the heart of United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:16 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 9:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 5:31 am
Twitter v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:49 am
Zamfir v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 2:37 pm
See Cruz v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:23 am
In responding to the suit, North Carolina legislators argue that such actions are also barred in state courts. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:58 am
Thereafter, the defendants moved pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the amended complaint on the grounds, inter alia, that it was time-barred and that it failed to state a cause of action. [read post]
