Search for: "Branch v. White"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,420
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
From the perspective of politics, deference to agencies surely holds differing levels of appeal depending on which political party occupies the White House and oversees the executive branch. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
Some courts have held that the executive branch has virtually unfettered discretion to dismiss an action brought in its name to remedy a wrong allegedly done to it. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Last month, a federal appeals panel gave the back of its hand to Rep. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:47 am
The report notes that Congress’s reliance on outside counsel “began as far back as December 29, 1818, when the House adopted a resolution authorizing the Speaker to hire private counsel to defend the Sergeant at Arms in the landmark case of Anderson v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 5:00 am
Indeed, Reynolds v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 11:34 pm
" NFIB v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Perhaps the best starting point for analysis of the compelled-speech realm remains Wooley v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:40 am
" (United States v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 6:00 am
He once opposed Roe v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:57 am
Buchanan Roe v. [read post]
[David Bernstein] Do the Ethnic Categories Used by Universities for "Diversity" Purposes Make Sense?
4 May 2022, 3:50 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
He worries that Congress would risk “physical combat with the Executive Branch” by “dispatch[ing] the Sergeant-at-Arms to arrest and imprison an Executive Branch official. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:50 am
” More broadly, did the executive branch intend to wade this far into Syria’s civil war or use it as a proxy battleground without congressional authorization? [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
They insulated themselves from the normal checks and balances between the political branches and the judiciary. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:09 am
Moldovan MPs have passed a ban on Russian war symbols, including the letters Z and V and the St George ribbon. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
One point of connection between the Kennedy book and the Harlan book is that each revealed how historians’ fixation on the presidency often obscures the importance of other branches of government. [read post]
