Search for: "Brown v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 9,669
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
" In contrast, the Appellate Division held that "despite the lenient pleading standard governing employment discrimination cases, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for sex discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law because it contains no factual allegations giving rise to an inference of discrimination," citing Brown v City of New York, 188 AD3d 518, [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
" In contrast, the Appellate Division held that "despite the lenient pleading standard governing employment discrimination cases, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for sex discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law because it contains no factual allegations giving rise to an inference of discrimination," citing Brown v City of New York, 188 AD3d 518, [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:56 pm
Saeedy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
A Connecticut appellate court affirmed a decision by the state’s Compensation Review Board that affirmed a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Commissioner dismissing a former employee’s claim for benefits related to injuries sustained when the former employee lit the wick of a small brown sphere and it exploded. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 2:22 pm
X Corp. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 10:44 am
” Similarly, Brown v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Secondly, it claims, in effect, that the Master of the Rolls’ private researches demonstrates the law, as stated in the leading text book, to be not only wrong but unarguable. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
It must at times defy us in rejecting racism as cases such as Brown v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Palomar Health v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
Palomar Health v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:13 pm
Part I – Fighting About the Forum: State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm
” Cunniff states the report’s bottom line as follows: “After an objective analysis, the reviewer concluded that the Sagadahoc County Sheriff’s Office’s responses to concerns about Mr. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 9:15 am
2022cv1564-24 [9] Feist Publications, Inc., v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 4:17 pm
From Murry v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Roberts's memo states the point clearly. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 2:30 pm
Browne v Dunn Rears Its Head Against this, the defendant’s case suffered from a tendency to attempt to produce inadmissible hearsay, and contravention of the ancient tripwire Browne v Dunn, a case from 1893 that requires litigants to put statements of fact to opposing witnesses in cross-examination if the litigant later intends to claim that the statement of fact contradicts the testimony of the opposing witness. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 1:25 pm
Simmons v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:44 pm
Since the US Supreme Court’s 2021 Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm
Brown (Major Crimes Act: Indian Status) Sellards-Reck v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 8:32 am
Sales v. [read post]
