Search for: "Brown v. State of Cal" Results 181 - 200 of 728
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
North Coast Railroad Authority (2017) 3 Cal.5th 677, the high court held that CEQA applied to a state public entity’s railroad project on a State-owned rail line as an act of “self-governance,” and was not a preempted “regulation” (i.e., not an “environmental preclearance requirement”) under the Federal Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:01 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Cal., November 7, 2017) About the Author: Evan Brown is a Chicago technology and intellectual property attorney. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:57 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Cal., November 6, 2017 About the Author: Evan Brown is a Chicago technology and intellectual property attorney. [read post]
 In his veto message, Governor Brown stated that he was awaiting the California Supreme Court’s decision as to when a city may insist on inclusionary zoning in new developments before taking action in this area. [read post]
 In his veto message, Governor Brown stated that he was awaiting the California Supreme Court’s decision as to when a city may insist on inclusionary zoning in new developments before taking action in this area. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 1:59 pm by Guest Author
This post was authored by Laura Schulkind, Jenny Denny and Eileen O’Hare-Anderson  Many of you are facing tremendous challenges with the current fires in both ends of the state. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 1:59 pm by Guest Author
This post was authored by Laura Schulkind and Eileen O’Hare-Anderson  Many of you are facing tremendous challenges with the current fires in both ends of the state. [read post]