Search for: "Brown v. Supreme Court of Virginia" Results 181 - 200 of 700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2022, 8:17 pm by Guest Author
The Supreme Court ended its most recent term with a slew of blockbuster decisions, one of which was West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:21 am
Brown, the Supreme Court held that a demand for discovery, or even a request for a bill of particulars, was a tolling event under the speedy trial statute. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 10:39 am by Steve Sanders
He formerly practiced as a member of the Supreme Court and appellate group at Mayer Brown LLP, and represented twenty-three law and history professors as amici in Varnum v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
ICYMI:  9 Landmark Supreme Court Cases That Shaped LGBTQ Rights in America (Time)Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court if she is elected. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
Ct., March 20, 2015), the Alaska Supreme Court held that a trial court was incorrect in dismissing a RLUIPA claim by a Buddhist prisoner who wanted to receive a kosher diet and to purchase a prayer shawl.In Lewis v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 5:48 am by Amy Howe
At CNSNews.com, Lynn Wardle discusses a list of the Supreme Court’s worst decisions; he concludes that, although the list “betrays a very strong ideological bias,” it is also a “good reminder that the Supreme Court has stumbled from time to time and has committed some very serious blunders. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Cunningham & Ute Römer-Barron, Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine, (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024).Elias Neibart, M.A. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Sotomayor, dissented from the denial of review in Harness v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 12:11 pm
The Supreme Court Justices tend to do the same thing in order to prove that they have precedent on their side, regardless of whether or not the cited cases are truly applicable. [read post]