Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 181 - 200
of 3,569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2009, 3:43 am
The Superintendent's interpretation of 11 NYCRR 65-3.9(c) is additionally consistent with the spirit and purpose of the No-Fault Law (see generally Matter of ATM One v Landaverde, 2 NY3d at 477). [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am
The disclaimer was consequently allowable under G 1/16 and G 1/03.Auxiliary request III - Novelty vis-à-vis D1The subject-matter of claim 1 was novel over the disclosure in D1. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
This was also clear from point 6.2 of G 1/15. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
This was also clear from point 6.2 of G 1/15. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:26 pm
Chief Justice John G. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
” These passages, therefore, establish that the two conditions set out in headnotes 2.2 and 2.4 of G 1/03 have the same value. [read post]
8 May 2023, 11:43 pm
The Board then issued a communication containing its provisional opinion, in which it indicated inter alia that the opposition ground under Article 100(c) EPC was considered to be prejudicial to maintenance of the patent as granted and that claim 1 of the first to ninth auxiliary requests were considered not to fulfil the requirement of Article 123(2) EPC. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 11:46 am
(c) The association must deliver a ballot to every unit owner with the notice. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
Read more: Robert G. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
The examining division held the subject-matter of claims 1 and 2 of the set of claims filed with letter dated 7 August 2015 "to be within the exception to patentability Article 53(b) EPC and Rule 28(2) EPC" and refused the application.III. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:42 pm
” N.J.R.E. 801(c). [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
., Praetorian G Power I, LLC, Praetorian G Power II, LLC, Praetorian G Power IV, LLC, Praetorian G Power V, LLC, Praetorian G Power VI, LLC, David E. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:38 pm
By Steven G. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:10 pm
§ 303(c). [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:41 am
G 3/97 and G 4/97), the consequence of which being that the opposition is inadmissible? [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:16 pm
The only thing that matters is that the property is no longer owned at death. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
Thus the Board found that examination of all the objections under A 100(b) was appropriate. [2.3.1] Although the respondent argued that the subject matter of claim 1 could only be considered under A 100(b) once a form of claim had been arrived at which fulfilled the requirements of A 100(c), the Board finds that A 100(c) requirements do not outweigh the requirements under A 100(b), nor that there should be a presumption that the claims would necessarily be found… [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:42 am
Inventive step or sufficiency, why does it matter? [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:20 pm
Mortgages expert witness Joffrey G. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:01 pm
GARRETT, PETER G. [read post]
