Search for: "California Company v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 9,721
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2009, 12:56 am
On October 21, 2009, a California District Court judge denied a motion to decertify a punitive damages class in Iorio v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 11:04 am by William McGrath
On Wednesday, May 18, Judge James Selna in California became the latest Judge to rule on the issue of whether the FCPA extended to payments made to employees of foreign state-owned companies. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 11:47 pm
Balboa Peninsula lies adjacent to the island and was conveyed to the East Newport Town Company ("East Newport") by the State of California in 1904. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 6:35 am
Corporations, including publicly-traded companies may wish to review their procedures for addressing unclaimed stock in light of a recent California Supreme Court decision. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 7:11 pm by Venkat
The California Court of Appeal recently issued a blockbuster of a decision in Hypertouch v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:08 am by Jonathan Tycko
  California, like most states, has an escheat law, which requires a company to turn over to the state monies held by the company that belong to someone else but that are “unclaimed. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Su represented employees of a garment sewing company who sued the company and the clothing manufacturer with whom the company did most of its business, alleging violations of various federal and state labor laws regarding wages and working conditions. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:38 am
The California Supreme Court last week handed down a major ruling endorsing the “all-sums-with-stacking” approach for insurance coverage in long-tail environmental claims.On August 9, 2012, the Court issued its unanimous opinion in State of California v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 9:39 am by HRWatchdog
A California Court of Appeal overruled the trial court, held that the FMCSA supersedes California’s meal and rest break laws, and dismissed the employee’s claims (Espinoza v. [read post]