Search for: "California v. John" Results 181 - 200 of 4,436
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2008, 1:24 pm
John Joseph Cota, the California maritime pilot accused in the November 2007 spill of approximately 58,000 gallons of heavy fuel oil in the San Francisco Bay. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:30 am
Cota, who was piloting the M/V Cosco Busan on November 7, 2007 when it collided [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 11:03 am by Tracy Coenen
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and John V. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:17 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday in Friedrichs v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Morse Barnes-Brown Pendleton
Court of Appeals case decided in the Central District of California, Macom Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:20 pm
John WardHolding: Motion to Transfer Venue DENIEDThe defendant sought to transfer venue of this patent case to the Northern District of California. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:35 am by Amy Howe
The challengers had also made a second argument: Under the Supreme Court’s 1970 decision in Pike v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:00 am by Glenn Cohen
Holder from John Robertson, which I think John will be publishing soon. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:18 am by Brad Kuhn
Kassouni will focus on the California Court of Appeal's decision in Lockaway Storage v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:05 am by Susan Brenner
  So, if that decision were to survive this appeal, it would mean that John’s sister and brother would have to sue in California, in an effort to obtain access to the email account. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:57 am
While the Supreme Court has taken some heat in the past for seeming to misunderstand technology and how it impacts the normal person’s life, with Riley v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 3:25 am
Defendants have also attacked the frivolousness of the RIAA's evidence, and claim that the joinder of various "John Does" in a single case is in violation of the order in Fonovisa v. [read post]