Search for: "California v. Page"
Results 181 - 200
of 5,037
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 2:54 pm
Today, in a highly-anticipated decision, the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 6:42 pm
Supreme Court in Tandon v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
Cone v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm
His opinion on remand quotes pages and pages from it. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 4:47 pm
The California Supreme Court today granted review in Hernandez v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:09 pm
(D) Neither (A) nor (B).Personally, I think that (D) is the answer least likely to be true.Regardless, the defendant is sentenced to death, and the California Supreme Court unanimously affirms. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 4:02 pm
If you're looking for a California case that refuses to enforce a "browsewrap" arbitration and class action waiver clause, this is the opinion for you.Not only is the holding what you're looking for, but it's 50+ pages of history and precedent and everything you ever wanted to know about the validity of arbitration agreements in analogous situations.Comprehensive, to say the least. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 6:05 pm
Albeit one that only criminal lawyers in California -- or those cognizant of this field -- would find interesting, or (potentially) even understand:If it ain't a wobbler, or at least a stealth wobbler, you can't knock it down to a misdemeanor.Read Justice Aronson's opinion for the nine-page version. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 11:17 pm
Because it's the lowest form of juvenile humor, even though it was the only opinion published today by the California Court of Appeal, I promised myself I wasn't going to comment about the caption in this case.But then, on page four, I read this line by Justice Aaron: "Ralph saw Goodwillie put something down his pants. . . . [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:21 pm
You can read the first ten pages of this 80+ page opinion if you'd like. [read post]
30 May 2020, 7:09 pm
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:40 pm
Can you really state all the relevant facts of an appeal, as well as cogently identify the relevant legal principles, in a case of first impression in under four-and-a-half double-spaced pages? [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:38 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 12:59 pm
In Sikhs for Justice, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:10 am
In Sikhs For Justice ("SFJ"), Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
The California Supreme Court denied review in October. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 1:48 pm
For detailed information concerning this situation we look to Merck's Form 10-Q SEC filing for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015 (at pages 20-21 of the PDF): ... on March 26, 2014, [relying upon his earlier ruling in the Glynn v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Recently, in Cuevas v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:21 pm
A recent gem of a short letter ruling from the Delaware Court of Chancery in Goldman v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 8:45 am
The recent case of Perlan Therapeutics v. [read post]
