Search for: "California v. Superior Court"
Results 181 - 200
of 5,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2011, 3:41 am
On January 21, 2011, a California state court issued a tentative ruling on the case Association of Irritated Residents, et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 9:54 am
EFF is filing an amicus letter in support of a petition for review, asking the California Supreme Court to overturn a harmful appellate court decision in Sander v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:33 am
Superior Court (Atlantic Richfield Co.), 161 Cal. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:59 pm
Superior Court (Hohnbaum) (and also Brinkley v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:23 am
Superior Court is whether an employer must ensure that hourly employees take breaks. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 2:02 pm
Superior Court applies retroactively. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:47 am
Superior Court’s Complex Division, before Judge Carl J. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:47 am
Superior Court’s Complex Division, before Judge Carl J. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Superior Court, no. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 11:55 am
The California Supreme Court granted review of Harris v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:54 pm
Superior Court, the Court of Appeal found that Liberty Mutual claims adjusters likewise were non-exempt.The headline here, though, is that the Court thoroughly analyzed the administrative test, and explained the limited applicability of the administrative test in California (although the court claimed it was relying on federal regulations). [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:30 am
Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Supreme Court, in Dynamex Operations v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:00 am
Superior Court, applies retroactively. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:49 pm
The most notable point in Patrick Hindert's write up of the decision filed January 26, 2011 (Ceron v. 321 Henderson Receivables), a California Court of Appeals case is a quote from a Superior Court... [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 8:52 am
Padilla I (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV27561) (Crest), Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis ruled that California Corporations Code Section 301.3 (SB 826), which requires publicly listed corporations in California to have women on their boards, violates the Equal Protection Clause of California’s Constitution. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 3:06 pm
Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:02 am
Superior Court (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 1264 [219 Cal.Rptr.3d 674]: did the Court of Appeal effectively over-rule the Supreme Court... [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 2:01 am
In The Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:45 pm
Plaintiff has filed a petition to the California Supreme Court requesting that it review the appellate decision in Brinker v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
The first Crest v. [read post]
