Search for: "California v. Vaughn" Results 181 - 200 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2011, 9:34 pm by Richard Painter
  Two bloggers at the National Review Online have accused federal district Judge Vaughn Walker of unethical conduct because (i) they do not agree with his decision in a case, (ii) the case involved same-sex marriage in California, and (iii) Judge Walker lives in California and has a stable relationship with another man. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am by Michael Ginsborg
She represented San Francisco in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (Cal. 2008) and Strauss v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Veden, Univ of Arkansas, Fayetteville: The Alchemy and Antirrhetic of West Coast Hotel v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:56 am by David J. DePaolo
In February the California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board ruled that Labor Code Section 3600.5(b) foreclosed its ability to take jurisdiction over Vaughn Booker's claim for cumulative injuries allegedly caused, at least in part, by his one professional football game in California. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
Indeed, the spirit of this question was raised by then-Chief Judge Vaughn Walker himself during the trial’s opening statements, when he provocatively asked, “If California were to get out of the marriage business – and simply classify everyone as registered domestic partners, wouldn’t that solve the problem? [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm by Amanda Beck
Indeed, the spirit of this question was raised by then-Chief Judge Vaughn Walker himself during the trial’s opening statements, when he provocatively asked, “If California were to get out of the marriage business – and simply classify everyone as registered domestic partners, wouldn’t that solve the problem? [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Jeff Gamso
.* * * * * * * * * You know about the Honorable Vaughn R. [read post]