Search for: "Campus v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 1,898
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
“The campus is dismayed by this unprecedented and dangerous decision to dramatically expand CEQA, and the campus will ask the California Supreme Court to overturn it,” the school said in a statement. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
The video discussed the effort by Arizona State University students to ban Rittenhouse from campus. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am by Tom Kosakowski
Facilitator: Akanmu Adebayo, Ombuds, Kennesaw State University Mediation v. ombuds. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by GSU Law Student
On February 13, 2003, she visited our campus in celebration of GSU Law’s 20th anniversary. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am by Arielle Harris
” SB 118: UC Enrollment Changes Not A CEQA “Project” Senate Bill 118 was the State Legislature’s targeted response to Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 5:59 am by Menachem Z. Rosensaft
These are the folks who would want to roll back segregation, for whom Loving v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 1:19 pm by Carmen N. Decot (Couden)
The OFCCP’s proposed changes would also require post-secondary institutions or other contractors “with campus-like settings” that maintain multiple affirmative action programs to submit the information requested in the scheduling letter and itemized listing “for all AAPs developed for campuses, schools, programs, buildings, departments, or other parts of [the] institution or company” located in the same city and state as the audited location. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 2:02 pm by Alison Martinez
 SB 118 is the swift legislative response to the March 2022 decision in Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 10:57 am by Greg Mersol
Most employers today have anti-harassment policies covering race, gender and other types of discrimination to help comply with state and federal antidiscrimination legislation and to take advantage of the affirmative defense described in Faragher v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm by Gregory V. Mersol
Most employers today have anti-harassment policies covering race, gender and other types of discrimination to help comply with state and federal antidiscrimination legislation and to take advantage of the affirmative defense described in Faragher v. [read post]