Search for: "Cariou v. Prince" Results 181 - 200 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2014, 1:07 pm by Alfred Steiner
(Courts need to do better at recognizing this enormous difference in the context of unique objects–the Second Circuit in Cariou v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:33 am by Jonathan Bailey
One of the prime examples is the 2013 case Cariou v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Prince: Reviving the Forgotten Statutory Text https://t.co/nhBUL8i09z -> Warner Bros.' 'Superman' Rights Confirmed by Appeals Court https://t.co/xLCXw9kxH5 -> Remarks at the California Copyright Conference #irespectmusic Grassroots Advocacy Panel https://t.co/5tGGLpsDhO -> National | The EU-US Privacy Shield: Too timid? [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
Acuff-Rose case, where the court explained that the more an unauthorized derivative work is transformative, the more likely such use is fair under §107 of the Copyright Act (p. 13).Transformative works can be mash-ups, remixes, fan-fiction, fan-made videos, or can also be works of visual arts which incorporate elements of previous works, such as Richard Prince’s CanalZone series which led in the U.S. to the much debated Cariou v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:11 pm
Prince, Second Circ. 2013 at 709).Is This Fair Use? [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
 This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more difficult to… [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 6:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The court then expressed “skeptic[ism]” about the approach of Prince v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  I admit I’m not sure what the difference is here—this seems like the court in Cariou singling out five of Prince’s collages. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:12 am
This Kat thinks that under US law the response should be pretty straightforward, in the sense of 'No' being likely answer, as any potentially infringing activities might be considered fair use within §107 of the Copyright Act, particularly because of their transformative nature [as recent examples, see Cariou v Prince, here, and Seltzer v Green Day, here]. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 3:05 am
Moses PelhamEarlier this week The IPKat reported that Advocate General (AG) Szpunar has now issued his (non-insubstantial: 100 paragraphs) Opinion in Pelham, C-476/17 (the Metall auf Metall case). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 12:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But we do need them to be informed about/apply aesthetic principles: Cariou v. [read post]