Search for: "Case v. Case" Results 181 - 200 of 294,811
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
It then went into the analysis of whether such violation was justified by the competing interests and rights at stake in the case at hand. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 am by Aileen McColgan, Matrix Chambers.
On 5 March the Supreme Court hears KAS or H v The Lord Advocate & Anor, BH v The Lord Advocate & Anor. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:44 am by Ted Folkman
But since it’s a slow news day and since the case has general interest, our case of the day is Republic of Iraq v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:30 am by D Daniel Sokol
Massimiliano Kadar describes Case T-704/14 – Marine Harvest v Commission: On ‘Gun Jumping’ and Public Bids. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 9:08 am by Trev Peterson
The post Adjustments made to debt limits for Chapter 11 Subchapter V and Chapter 13 cases by Trev E. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 5:53 am
In an interesting development, the case has been transferred to the Northern District of California. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:54 am by Grace Capel
The Supreme Court begins a two-day hearing in the high-profile case of Julian Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority today. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:30 am by hlpronline
Third in the HLPR Case Comment series, “Least Restrictive Means”: Burwell v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am by Louise Pearce
On applying general principles from the House of Lords case of Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Total Network SL [2008] UKHL 19, the court held there can be a cause of action in unlawful means conspiracy cases where the unlawful means consists only of deliberate breaches of court orders. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by INFORRM
In a recent case management conference in the ongoing Yeo v Times Newspapers libel litigation (also see our blog ‘The End of Juries in Libel Trials? [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
The Supreme Court has given judgment in Patmalniece v SSWP [2011] UKSC 11, a case which required consideration of what constitutes direct discrimination on nationality grounds under EU law and, in cases of indirect discrimination, whether a concern to prevent “ social tourism” is a justification which is independent of nationality. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 12:00 pm
A new contested case has been brought in Brooklyn federal court, Capitol v. [read post]