Search for: "Case v. Kelly" Results 181 - 200 of 2,619
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2022, 5:56 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Then, when the Supreme Court effectively confirmed that CIA black sites were unlawful in 2006 by ruling in Hamdan v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Today's essay will focus on the second point, harnessing evidence from an order the Court issued yesterday in Ward v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 3 November 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Kelly v Hilton [No 2] [2022] WASC 374, in [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
”[36] “Most viewing rooms consist of large images of the works available for sale (sometimes with a price), an ‘inquire’ button that allows the viewer to email the gallery directly, and, in some cases, a click-to-purchase feature. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
So, with no further ado, here is this year’s updated list of actual cases related to Halloween. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 10:48 am by Brian Turetsky
  It is worth noting that the Chamber filed its case in a Texas federal district court, so any eventual appeal of that case would go to the Fifth Circuit, which held last week that the CFPB’s funding mechanism is unconstitutional in Community Financial Services Association of America v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am by John Elwood
United States (involving the prosecution of the former Virginia governor), Kelly v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, the Court of Appeals held that "For the purpose of Retirement and Social Security Law, the applicant bears the burden of establishing that the disability was the result of an accident, which is defined as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact". [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, the Court of Appeals held that "For the purpose of Retirement and Social Security Law, the applicant bears the burden of establishing that the disability was the result of an accident, which is defined as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact". [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
Kelly Kasulis Cho reports for the Washington Post. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:57 pm by William Appleton
  Peter Marguiles analyzed the Fifth Circuit’s Oct. 5 ruling in Texas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:11 am by Anna Bower
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Patton v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:13 am by John Jascob
” The SEC has since adopted further amendments to some of the proxy rules at issue in the case (National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]