Search for: "Cash v. Superior Court" Results 181 - 200 of 485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2016, 1:18 am by Sandra Sithole
In agreeing with Mutual & Federal, the court in Expectio Properties (Pty) Ltd v Mutual & Federal Insurance Company Limited held that under the insuring clause the election whether to indemnify by money or reinstatement lies with the insurer. [read post]
18 May 2016, 3:04 pm by Shahram Miri
In a recent published opinion, the California Court of Appeal answered in the negative.Babbitt v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:56 pm by Mark Ashton
 The trial court in Clinton County and the Superior Court affirmed the agreement. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 8:00 am by Shane Smith
In Pennsylvania, actual cash value has consistently been interpreted to mean repair or replacement costs less depreciation.1 In Gilderman v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” In a March 9, 2016 decision (here), Delaware Superior Court Judge Jan R. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
The reason for this Suffolk Superior Court appeal is that (d) in this regulation was misinterpreted by the Hearing Officer after it was recklessly misrepresented by the Office of Medicaid. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
The reason for this Suffolk Superior Court appeal is that (d) in this regulation was misinterpreted by the Hearing Officer after it was recklessly misrepresented by the Office of Medicaid. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 11:21 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Players also win chips, but these cannot be redeemed for cash, so the court says this also is not a “thing of value”. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 8:49 am
Filed:  October 29, 2015Opinion by:  Graeff, J.Holdings:  (1) The common-law fiduciary duties of candor and maximization of shareholder value articulated in Shenker v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm by INFORRM
In Buck v Morris et al., 2015 ONSC 5632 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a libel action arising out of a “Statement from the Town of Aurora Counsel”. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court Act 2003, which established the new Supreme Court, was enacted soon after. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:31 am
It is against this background that we assess whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court unreasonably applied clearly established federal law. [read post]