Search for: "Champagne v. Champagne"
Results 181 - 200
of 305
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2015, 5:50 am
State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
Krishnan v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:58 am
A similar factual matrix was presented in a WIPO proceeding, Comité Interprofessionnel du vin de Champagne v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 5:02 am
In Enlow v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 5:53 am
Champagne pour tout le monde !!! [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
This was approved by Sullivan CJ in the Irish Supreme Court in Sinclair v Gogarty [1937] IR 377 (see also Gallagher v Tuohy (1924) 58 ILTR 134 (Murnaghan J); Connolly v Radio Telifís Eireann [1991] 2 IR 446 (Carroll J); Reynolds v Malocco [1999] 2 IR 203, [1999] 1 ILRM 289, [1998] IEHC 175 (11 December 1998) (Kelly J)); and it represents the law in Australia (Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [2006] HCA 46 (28 September 2006)),… [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:12 am
Stone v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:52 pm
Licensing Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:21 pm
One would have thought that, given the enormity of its founder’s litigation woes, the company famed for topless shots of inebriated coeds would have shied away from the battle, but some silver-tongued litigator-type convinced them that they had to go all the way for the good of the brand.More recently, the Kiwis sought revenge for the decades-old prohibition on use of the word “champagne” to describe any sparkling wine of non-Gallic origin, and got back a bit of their own… [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
While I'm all for a good celebration, I wouldn't break out the champagne yet if I were on the dark side. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:34 pm
In K-Tech Telecommunications v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 6:27 pm
” The following year, in DeJong v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:48 am
See Hill v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:51 pm
See Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:55 am
For example, the provision that the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Spencer said was meaningless is essentially reproduced in full. 44 An organization may disclose an individual’s person [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
ti v Uniunea Compozitorilor ? [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Tewari De-Ox Systems Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Let’s get to it… Elie waxes poetic about the West Coast: LOS ANGELES v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 12:47 pm
The first case, State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
ECIS (the European Committee for Interoperable Systems) has an event in the offing. a birthday celebration seminar, plus champagne, dedicated to the SAS v WPL software copyright case which is to be considered by the Court of Justice of the European Union just one of these days. [read post]
