Search for: "Chase v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 2,372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d… [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner acknowledged that "[p]ursuing and subduing a fleeing suspect is an ordinary employment duty of a police officer" (Matter of Quartucio v DiNapoli, 110 AD3d 1336, 1337 [2013] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]), and he agreed that such pursuits could entail "chasing [suspects] across all different types of terrain, uneven ground, jumping fences" and the like (see Matter of Sweeney v New York State Comptroller, 86 AD3d… [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 2:02 pm
Tony Mauro has this new Legal Times article about today's SCOTUS oral argument in Scott v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm by Jim Lindgren
It is true that Alexander Hamilton and one Supreme Court Justice, Samuel Chase in Hylton v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
This Article elaborates upon that argument and situates it within the particular context of the case of United States v. [read post]