Search for: "Christopher v. Jones"
Results 181 - 200
of 306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 1:22 am
Supreme Court is scheduled to hear argument in a wage and hour case on April 16, 2012, in the Christopher v. [read post]
Jan. 5 - 9, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:13 pm
Kurt Jones Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 09a0004n.06 Durham v. [read post]
Jan. 5 - 9, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:13 pm
Kurt Jones Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 09a0004n.06 Durham v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:02 am
First, the decision in Riley v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
[Note: For background to this post, please read its predecessor here.]After the Motion to Recuse and Vacate discussed in the previous post, the petition for rehearing heaps on many more reasons why the South Carolina Supreme Court should place no confidence in its divided result in the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina case. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
[Note: For background to this post, please read its predecessor here.]After the Motion to Recuse and Vacate discussed in the previous post, the petition for rehearing heaps on many more reasons why the South Carolina Supreme Court should place no confidence in its divided result in the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina case. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Clarke, Eric Clem, Danelle Clifton, Ward Closterman, David Coder, Julie Coen, Shirley L Coffie, Michelle Cohen, Peter Cohen, Steven Cohn, Larry Cole, Anita Collins, Christopher Collison, Paul D. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
There could be a third argument- i.e. that they both had the same idea, contributed significant relevant originality (Brighton v Jones [2004]) and, in fact, the selfies are works of joint authorship; there being collaboration present and no need for an intention to create a joint work (Beckingham v Hodgens [2002]). [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm
Jordan Brunner and Emma Kohse provided a detailed overview of Carpenter v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 6:34 am
Christopher, Cr. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
You may read other coverage of this elsewhere, as in attendance were Aric Press of The American Lawyer, Leigh Jones of The National Law Journal, David Lat of AboveTheLaw, and other reporters. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
A former lecturer at University College London Dr Christopher Backhouse paid US academic Dr Erica Smith £49,975 in damages in settlement of privacy and harassment proceedings. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 10:40 am
Jones v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
The status of Camp Christopher also seems to be in doubt. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage in that action too intensively and… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm
Carr and Montgomery v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(UCLA)Camp Mary Elizabeth (Indiana University)Carmel Jonathan (University of Michigan)Carroll Christopher (Johns Hopkins University)Cassar Gavin (University of Pennsylvania)Chaney Thomas (University of Chicago)Chari Varadarajan V. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 8:12 am
Christopher’s “white skin. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:53 am
Christopher Boehning and Daniel J. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:52 am
The Leading Case Law The Court noted that while Doeblin cited to cases like Jones v Voskresenskaya (125 AD3d 532 [1st Dept 2015]), and Pokoik v Pokoik (115 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2014]), for the general “proposition that members of an LLC may owe a fiduciary duty to the LLC and to other members,” Doeblin lacked any case law support for the specific proposition that non-managing members owe fiduciary duties. [read post]
