Search for: "Chrysler Corp Claims"
Results 181 - 200
of 242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2009, 7:02 am
Indiana Pensioners Take Chrysler Deal to Supreme Court: Late Saturday, a group of Indiana pension funds opposed to the sale of Chrysler to Italy’s Fiat asked the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 4:20 pm
As injured parties, they want to make sure that they will still receive compensation for their products liability and personal injury claims even though General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 10:10 am
If that provision remained intact, there is almost no doubt that it would be repeated in any deal to spare bankrupt General Motors Corp. from existing and future accident claims, thus affecting millions more cars and trucks now in use. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 4:28 am
———– The case of In re Chrysler LLC, Debtor has the potential to produce the most significant Supreme Court ruling on the government’s power to deal with economic crisis since the Court struck down major parts of President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal, in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:28 am
Bloomberg News reports, "Plaintiffs in personal-injury and product-liability lawsuits against Chrysler LLC and General Motors Corp. are pressing members of Congress to ensure that their cases will be heard in court or an alternate form of compensation is found. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 12:05 am
See, e.g., In re White Motor Credit Corp., 75 B.R. 944, 949 (Bankr. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:46 am
Meanwhile, the General Motors Acceptance Corp. has not filed for bankruptcy protection. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:03 am
The case was Daimler/Chrysler v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 12:13 pm
Insurers who said they are prepared to accept the TARP funds include Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Prudential Financial, Inc., Principal Financial Group, Inc., Lincoln National Corp., and Allstate Corp. [read post]
8 May 2009, 11:00 am
He claims that while negotiating the fate of Chrysler and its obligations, one of his clients "was directly threatened by the White House ... under threat that the full force of the White House press corps would destroy its reputation if it continued to fight. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:31 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 5:46 pm
Buckeye Chrysler-Jeep-Dodge of Shelby, 2008 WL 2789074, No. 2007-CA-0121 (Ohio. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 3:04 am
Daimler Chrysler Corp. and Khulumani v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:21 pm
"Defendants in the claim, including Chrysler Motor Corp and Honeywell International, obtained a Court Order to bar the funeral minutes before the burial of the deceased asbestos worker. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Asbestos Corp., 480 A.2d 647, 651 (Del. 1984), an asbestos case (obviously), but that was as much because of lack of exposure as due to any evaluation of the viability of the underlying claim.Moreover, Guinan I stated that not only was medical monitoring itself uncertain under Delaware law, but plaintiffs advocated a "novel theory that a tort claim for medical monitoring can be applied to medical procedures and devices. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:56 am
Chrysler Corp., 884 F.2d 904 (6th Cit. 1989), the rule of reason is the appropriate analysis because Leegin operated in a "dual distribution" situation. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
Chrysler LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
General Motors Corp 6th Affirms Pro Se $120,000 Employment Discrimination VerdictMadden v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(Spicy IP) Both Hindi cinema and theatre are accused of copyright infringement by relatives of dead authors (Spicy IP) Dispute between Bisleri and Coca-Cola over ‘Maaza’ trade mark ends up in Delhi High Court (Spicy IP) Geographical indications: the BASMATI wrangle (International Law Office) Foreign geographical indications enter India: (Spicy IP) Trade mark search essential to reveal deceptively similar trade marks (International Law Office) Outsourcing patent related services… [read post]
