Search for: "Citibank v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2013, 12:42 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Citicorp, based in New York, did the same thing, and is running its credit card operation out of South Dakota through Citibank, N.A., and previously Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:23 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
” US v Brandon Lee Price – Federal Criminal Complaint US v Brandon Lee Price – Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint 18 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 3:48 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Citibank Court Dismisses Lawsuit Under Michigan Spam Statute Based on Preemption and Lack of Standing — Hafke v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am by Wolfgang Demino
" Law Research Serv., Inc. v Crook, 36 AD2d 912, 912 (1st Dept 1971)(no long-arm jurisdiction over out-of-state attorney whose only connection to the state is that he hired New York attorney to represent his client in a Texas proceeding).This situation is markedly different from other cases finding jurisdiction based on the engagement of a New York lawyer or law firm by an out-of-state entity. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:46 am by Michael B. Stack
., “Schirizzo v Citibank NA-BANKING” signals a return to the original method of measuring workers’ compensation payments after a lapse of more than 65 years. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:18 am by Jessica Mendelson
Citibank Delaware, the court held that if the chosen state’s law is contrary to a fundamental public policy of the forum state, the parties’ choice of law will not be enforced. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The account at issue in Madden v Midland involved an open-end credit card plan (aka credit card account) and the account was not sold by Bank of America to an unaffiliated national bank, contrary representation by the Curious authors notwithstanding. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, a legal malpractice claim cannot be stated if there is no attorney-client relationship between the parties (Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 3 [1st Dept 2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]