Search for: "Cities Service Oil Co., Appeal of" Results 181 - 200 of 242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm by admin
The eight facilities have a combined storage capacity of more than 71 million gallons of oil. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
Mobil Oil Co., 866 F.2d 1149, 1155 (9th Cir. 1989) (following Associated General Contractors formulation); Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Click Here BP in talks to settle Texas City fine -OSHA memo. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
Click Here Settlement Agreement for Recovery of Past Response Costs Colorado Bumper Exchange Site, Pueblo, Pueblo County, CO. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm by admin
The agency fined metal home products maker Lasko Products $29,559 and paint-maker Egyptian Lacquer Manufacturing Co. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Click Here Pacific Pipelines to pay penalty for oil spill. - Eric Watkins, Oil & Gas Journal, January 25, 2010 The US Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said Pacific Pipeline Systems LLP, a Long Beach, Calif. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 10:45 am by charonqc
|  The Billion Dollar Bonus Capitalists@Work is, in my view, essential reading for any British lawyer (and I can see no reason why overseas lawyers could not benefit from the views and thoughts of City Unslicker and his colleagues. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm by admin
Oil interests compete with agriculture needs; fears of sea level rise compete with the need for fast money to help avert crop disasters. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am by smtaber
Oil interests compete with agriculture needs; fears of sea level rise compete with the need for fast money to help avert crop disasters. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
But negotiators say they hope to at least plot a course toward a new agreement that could be signed at next year’s climate conference in Mexico City. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, December 2, 2009 The Ninth Circuit held that the Department of Interior’s Fish and Wildlife Service did not violate either the Marine Mammals Protection Act or the National Environmental Policy Act when it issued its regulations that allow the incidental “take” of marine animals. [read post]