Search for: "City Council v. Hall"
Results 181 - 200
of 260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2011, 7:31 am
The local news sources which are cited in the June 2010 blog post are also a great source to track current developments on City Councils, as the vendors’ appeals are considered and ordinances are revised. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
First, following Mr Justice Munby in Re E (an Alleged Patient); Sheffield City Council v E and S [2004] EWHC 2808 (Fam), he compared sexual consent to consenting to marriage. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2008. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 11:29 am
In City of San Jose v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
Brief for Natural Resources Defense Council as amici curiae supporting respondent, Monsanto v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am
Updated | Manchester City Council (Respondent) v Pinnock (Appellant) [2010] UKSC 45 On appeal from the Court of Appeal [2009] EWCA Civ 852 – Read judgment / press summary The following is based on the Supreme Court press summary. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court is considering the issue in Manchester CC v Pinnock, in which it heard oral argument earlier this year but in which written submissions on the effect of the decision in Kay v UK have been invited, and three other cases, Hounslow LBC v Powell, Leeds CC v Hall and Frisby v Birmingham CC, have been listed in the Supreme Court in late November raising the same or overlapping issue. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:14 am
After a lengthy pasting of every bed bug email and article this person could dig up — including one where people planned to “go commando,” after a report of bed bugs at Victoria’s Secret — NTBB gets back to being completely apoplectic:Since March 11, 2009 (over one year ago), when the City Council stated there was a “Bed Bug Epidemic,”WHAT DID THE KCDA DO TO PREEMPT THE EMINENT BED BUGS? [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Vol. 2, No. 22, August 2, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
Brian Haw (the second defendant) has been camping lawfully since 2001 on a pavement on the eastern side of PSG - a part of the highway controlled by Westminster City Council. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
Brian Haw (the second defendant) has been camping lawfully since 2001 on a pavement on the eastern side of PSG - a part of the highway controlled by Westminster City Council. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
City of Chicago extended gun rights to states and localities. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:51 am
Adding to the city’s woes: Last June, another dev [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:42 am
Here's a real-life example of how hearsay works, and the Court of Appeals provides that analysis in an interesting disability discrimination claim alleging that obesity is a protected disability under the New York City Human Rights Law.The case is Speigel v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
But this Supreme Court judgment should be the last time the Supreme Court is troubled by the legacy of Thompson v Elmbridge Borough Council [1987] 1 WLR 1425 and Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 1448. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
But this Supreme Court judgment should be the last time the Supreme Court is troubled by the legacy of Thompson v Elmbridge Borough Council [1987] 1 WLR 1425 and Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 1448. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
According to a consent agreement filed in Kansas City with the U.S. [read post]
