Search for: "Clair v. Clair" Results 181 - 200 of 896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
  Over to Katie, Rachel and Claire: "Last week, the UK Supreme Court held a 4-day hearing in Warner-Lambert v Actavis et al., the latest (perhaps last?) [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:10 pm
" And online at The Daily Beast, Jay Michaelson has an essay titled "Young v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Last Tuesday, at an event sponsored by the Supreme Court Historical Society, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asked Richard Primus and Randy Barnett how each would have decided Loving v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  HLS’s Dehlia Umunna discusses Powell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 11:47 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Hogan & Joanna Reyes, Downstream Human Rights Due Diligence: Informing Debate Through Insights from Business Practice Claire Rankin, Defending the Rights of Local Communities against Box-Ticking Exercises: An Analysis of Sustaining the Wild Coast NPC v Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy Natalie Bugalski & David Pred, Lessons from the ANZ-Phnom Penh Sugar Case for the OECD National Contact Point System of Corporate Accountability Daniel Kinderman, Klaus… [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a five-to-three opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 8:59 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Clair, the president’s attorney. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:18 pm
I don't think I buy the crucial arguments for either side in Jones v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:20 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Wisconsin Court of Appeals CIVIL PUBLISHED Employment Discrimination; issue preclusion Where a discrimination claim filed with the EEOC was found untimely, the same claim filed with the ERD is also untimely. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:13 am
Against this, Mr Alexander contends that the position on this point is not acte clair in favour of Total, and he accepts that it is not acte clair in favour of YV either; therefore, he says, the court should make a reference to the CJEU under Article 267 TFEU. 51. [read post]